Political Turmoil in the MK Party: Shivambu’s Departure and Mpofu’s Insights
Natalie Nyathi
Recent events in the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party have caused a lot of discussion and concern. Floyd Shivambu’s visit to fugitive pastor Shepherd Bushiri in Malawi marked a turning point in his role as party secretary-general, ultimately leading to his dismissal. His refusal to take back his statements about the visit increased the backlash, drawing criticism from figures like Justice Minister Mmamaloko Kubayi, who labeled it a “blatant act of disrespect” toward South Africa’s legal system.
Shivambu was removed as MK Party Secretary-General earlier this week and has been deployed to Parliament, specifically the National Assembly. Zuma stated that Shivambu’s actions, particularly his visit to Malawi to meet Bushiri, were deemed contrary to the spirit and regulations of the MK Party Constitution. He also expressed confidence that Shivambu’s redeployment will strengthen the MK Party caucus as the official opposition, noting that Floyd Shivambu carries a wealth of experience as a former member of Parliament.
Shivambu insisted that his visit had the backing of MK party leader Jacob Zuma, even after the party said he acted in a personal capacity. Instead of apologizing, he doubled down, which led to his sacking announced on June 3, 2025, just months after he joined MK from the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF).
Dali Mpofu, a well-known advocate and political figure, recently shared his thoughts on the situation during an interview on the EWN podcast “Politricking with Tshidi Madia.” He stated, “None of us own these positions,” highlighting the changing nature of political roles within the MK party. Following Shivambu’s removal, he was moved to Parliament to strengthen the party’s caucus, but not in a leadership role.
Mpofu described the leadership changes as necessary adjustments rather than demotions. He compared the current situation to the early days of the EFF, noting that the MK party’s structure—without regular elections—allows for quick changes in leadership, which can both help and confuse potential voters.
Despite the turmoil, Mpofu believed that these frequent changes could ultimately make the party stronger. However, he recognized the risks involved, saying, “The aesthetics are not good; we have had four or five SGs, but in my book would be a huge improvement.”
Throughout the interview, Mpofu defended his legal career against criticism. He explained that his cases often aim to challenge the system rather than just win. He also criticized the head of public prosecutions, Advocate Shamila Batohi, calling her “an unmitigated disaster,” reflecting wider frustrations with the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) after recent legal losses.
Mpofu’s comments about the Legal Practice Council and the charges against him suggest that he believes political motives are behind the scrutiny he faces. He pointed out inconsistencies in how complaints are handled, especially those related to gender rights.
As for his future in politics, Mpofu described himself as “a drifter,” open to whatever role the MK party may offer him but showing no desire to become a judge.
The MK party is at a crossroads, with leadership dynamics changing and outside pressures increasing. The mix of personal actions, party loyalty, and political strategy will shape its direction in the months ahead.
